We have a mess on our hands. First off, was time called by either umpire? That was the first thing they should have done. The real objective is to get the call correct, but in this case a can of worms can be opened. It is customary to only go for help when the umpire rules a runner safe. The request to the plate umpire would be made for a pulled foot or otherwise off the bag. As the base umpire, when you ask for help you have judged the ball beat the runner and you are only looking to see if there was contact with the bag. Secondly, with a runner on second the base umpire would be on the shortstop side of the infield where he may have a problem in seeing the pulled foot and can go to the plate umpire for help on the call if he needs to.
When the coach came out to ask the base umpire to go for help and did go to his partner and they talked and gave the base umpire information he may not have known, the base umpire may then change his call.
As far as the runner on second goes, it is up to the plate umpire to see where the runner may have been at the time of the out, before the appeal was made. In most cases, that runner, unless he is "The Flash" has just made 3rd base. So, as far as judgement goes, the runners would then be placed at 1st and 3rd. Two outs, next batter and some lost credibility.
On the issue of awarding the out on abandoning the base path, this is a moot point. The umpire called time for the discussion with the coach. You can't penalize a team for an infraction that occured during a stoppage in play that was initiated by the umpire.
See what I mean about a can of worms? I would think it be best handled like this: Coach, your runner is out, there is no appeal on the out and it stands. - J.R.
|